04/30/2023, M4.3 Swarm near Niland

Last updated May 1st, 2023

Significant Events

  • Largest event: M4.3, 30 Apr 2023 00:09:34 PDT, (33.200, -115.590), depth 2.0km. 8km WSW of Niland, California.
  • As of 01 May 2023, 10:37AM PDT, the following event numbers have been recorded in the swarm:
    • M≥4: 3
    • M≥3: 6
    • M≥2: 21
  • All M4 events recorded:
    • M 4.3 30 Apr 2023 00:09:34 PDT, (33.200, -115.590), 40215575
    • M 4.3 30 Apr 2023 00:10:10 PDT, (33.190, -115.593), 40215583
    • M 4.3 30 Apr 2023 00:58:19 PDT, (33.203, -115.585), 40215735

Swarm Numbers

  • As of 01 May 2023, 10:37AM PDT, we have recorded 59 events in the swarm (within a 20 km radius, and counting 5 days before the largest event). The smallest event is magnitude 1.0. Many of the smaller events are still being analyzed and will be gradually added to the catalogue.
  • More activity is expected in the next few days, swarm activity in Southern California can continue for hours, days, weeks, months or years. For more information on swarms please see our Swarm page.

Historical Seismicity

  • Since our records began in 1932 we’ve had 85 events of M4 or greater within 10km of today’s event.
  • The largest historic event was M5.8 on 1981/04/26.
  • The most recent historic event was M4.0 on 23 Aug 2021.

Faults

  • CFM fault associations: most likely Not associated with a CFM modeled fault (64%). Alternates: Elmore Ranch fault (27%), Other CFM faults (9%).*

Additional Information


Below are the waveform data associated with this event, as recorded in our Live Seismograms Feed.


*Earthquakes can occur both near or on major known faults, and in places where no clear fault zones are known. Using the statistical method of Evans et al. (in prep. 2019) the location and focal mechanism of this earthquake suggest the above association with modeled faults in the Community Fault Model (CFM) provided by the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) and Harvard University. Note that the CFM fault association may be different from the nearby faults list. Differences may arise due to different fault databases, and because the CFM fault association uses the hypocenter with relation to subsurface 3-dimensional fault orientation models, while the nearby faults list utilizes mapped surface traces as they relate to the epicenter.

CFM Fault: SCEC CFM 5.0 Fault name and closest segment if available; The CFM is maintained by Harvard University, Dept of Earth & Planetary Sciences.

Probability: The probability in percent the earthquake is associated with this fault.

SCSN: Caltech/USGS Southern California Seismic Network

**U.S. Geological Survey and California Geological Survey, 2006, Quaternary fault and fold database for the United States, accessed 2015, from USGS web site: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults/

This information is subject to change as more up-to-date data become available.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPrint this page
Tagged with: , , ,